Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Davis v. Internal Revenue Service
as 6:2021cv01872
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Davis
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUREM v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 3:2021cv00941
Plaintiff:
JASON C TUREM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, JANET YELLON, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hail et al v. WMD Sites et al
as 3:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Disability Division, N. Pelosi, Brandon Breslow and others
Plaintiff:
R. Lee, L. Hail Mackle, M.J. Christian Hail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KLINE v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 3:2021cv00073
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and STEVEN MNUCHIN
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALAN KLINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bush v. Department of Human Relations and Social Services et al
as 2:2020cv00950
Plaintiff:
June Marquee Larun Bush and June Marques Bush
Defendant:
Department of Human Relations and Social Services and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bush v. Department of Human Relations and Social Services et al
as 8:2020cv02876
Plaintiff:
June Marquee Larun Bush and June Marques Bush
Defendant:
Department of Human Relations and Social Services and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITAKER v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 5:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA B WHITAKER
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
SUGGS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2017cv00373
Plaintiff:
CALVIN EARL SUGGS, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00069
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
