Cases 41 - 50 of 99
v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW)
as 2:2014cv12825
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW)
Richard Thomason, et al v. Amalgamated Local No. 863, et al
as 14-3371
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THOMASON
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EVANS, MICHAEL LEWIS and MICHAEL OGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
AMALGAMATED LOCAL NO. 863 and INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA
UAW v. General Motors LLC
as 14-1019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Board of Administration of the Detroit Tooling Association-UAW Retirement Income Plan et al v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implements Workers of America, on Behalf of Itself, and Its Members
as 2:2013cv14528
Plaintiff:
Board of Administration of the Detroit Tooling Association-UAW Retirement Income Plan , Detroit Tooling Association-UAW Retirement Income Plan and Detroit Tooling Association, on Behalf of Itself, Its Successors, and Its Members
Defendant:
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implements Workers of America, on Behalf of Itself, and Its Members
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Flatford et al v. International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 663 et al
as 2:2013cv14243
Plaintiff:
Isarel Flatford , Jennifer Abel , Franklin Anderson and others
Defendant:
International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 663, International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184
VanRiper, et al. v. Local 14, International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, et al.
as 3:2013cv02102
Defendant:
Local 14, International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America , General Motors, LLC and International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America
Plaintiff:
Tammy VanRiper , Steven Albitz , Gary L. Anastasoff and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
TRW Automotive U. S., L. L. C. v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW) et al
as 4:2013cv12160
Plaintiff:
TRW Automotive U. S., L. L. C.
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW), Martin Lamer, John Yasso and others
TRW Automotive U. S., L. L. C. v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW) et al
as 2:2013cv12160
Defendant:
John Yasso, Ronald Gardner, INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW) and others
Plaintiff:
TRW Automotive U. S., L. L. C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Hollingsworth v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2013cv11625
Plaintiff:
Harry L Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 600
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Willard Bender, et al v. Newell Window Furnishings, Inc, et al
as 12-2059
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLARD BENDER, DON LAMPE, CAROLYN CONNER and others
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW)
Defendant - Appellant:
NEWELL WINDOW FURNISHINGS, INC., KIRSCH DIVISION, NEWELL OPERATING COMPANY, INC. and NEWELL RUBBERMAID HEALTH AND WELFARE PROGRAM 560
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
