Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harned v. Office of the Clerk of Fulton County Superior Court
as 1:2022cv03794
Plaintiff:
Irving A. Harned, Jr.
Defendant:
Office of the Clerk of Fulton County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harned v. Fulton County Clerk of the Court's Office et al
as 1:2022cv03476
Plaintiff:
Irving A. Harned, Jr.
Defendant:
Fulton County Clerk of the Court's Office and Fulton County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harned v. Hawkins, Parnell and Young LLC
as 1:2022cv03199
Plaintiff:
Irving A. Harned, Jr.
Defendant:
Hawkins, Parnell and Young LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harned v. Fulton County Office of Clerk of Court
as 1:2022cv02805
Plaintiff:
Irving A. Harned, Jr.
Defendant:
Fulton County Office of Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harned v. Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02364
Plaintiff:
Irving A. Harned, Jr.
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Harned v. Weathington Law Firm, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Irving A. Harned, Jr.
Defendant:
Weathington Law Firm, LLC, Paul Weathington, Jesse Broocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harned v. Hawkins, Parnell, and Young, LLP et al
as 1:2022cv02156
Plaintiff:
Irving A. Harned, Jr.
Defendant:
Hawkins, Parnell, and Young, LLP and Christine Mast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harned v. Carr
as 1:2022cv02042
Plaintiff:
Irving A. Harned, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harned v. Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01322
Plaintiff:
Irving A. Harned, Jr.
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harned v. The State of Georgia
as 1:2022cv01146
Plaintiff:
Irving A. Harned, Jr.
Defendant:
The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
