Cases 1 - 8 of 8
McClain v. Santoro et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Charlie McClain, Jr.
Defendant:
Nicola Santoro, Jr., Stanley C. Middleman, Paul C. Saville and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Thompson v. Frede et al
as 2:2018cv02036
Defendant:
VentureSpace LLC, Encompass Realty LLC, VS Capitol Drive LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory J Thompson and Gregory A Thompson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
HOME DESIGN SERVICES INC v. RIVER CITY HOMES AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2015cv00684
Petitioner:
Home Design Services, Inc.
Respondent:
RIVER CITY HOMES AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , MICHAEL BRANIFF and GARY J THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
HOME DESIGN SERVICES INC v. RIVER CITY HOMES AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
HOME DESIGN SERVICES INC
Defendant:
RIVER CITY HOMES AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, MICHAEL BRANIFF and GARY J THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Whitey's Beach Place et al
as 8:2015cv00757
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Stone Diamond Music Corp. and MJ Publishing Trust
Defendant:
Whitey's Beach Place , MFER Inc. , Douglas J. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
William J Thompson v. Mason West Inc et al
as 8:2011cv00683
Defendant:
MW Contracting, MW Engineering, Mason West Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William J Thompson
Capital Partners v. Thompson et al
as 5:2008cv03688
Plaintiff:
Capital Partners, Capital Partners and Capital Partners
Defendant:
Malcolm J Thompson, Malcolm J Thompson, Photon Dynamics, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lord & Sons, Inc v. Thompson et al
as 3:2007cv05496
Plaintiff:
Lord & Sons, Inc and Lord & Sons, Inc
Defendant:
William J. Thompson, Tomarco Contractor Specialties, Inc, Tomarco Fastening Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
