Cases 1 - 10 of 31
(PC) Baker v. Shirely et al
as 1:2024cv01442
Defendant:
J. Moeckly, Scott DeGough, Administrator EPA California and others
Plaintiff:
Millard Wayne Baker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Douglas v. Shirley et al
as 1:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Roger Douglas
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J. Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jackson v. Shirley et al
as 1:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Justin Marquiz Jackson
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, Scott Degough and J. Cronjager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Marshall v. Shirley et al
as 1:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Marshall Rayshawn and Rayshaun Marshall
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, Scott Degough and J. Cronjager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mathis v. Shirley et al
as 1:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Kwamaii Mathis
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, Scott Degough and J. Cronjager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Augustine v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Carlos Augustine
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Brown v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Artel Brown
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Morales v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Morales
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jackson v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jackson
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gadison v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Rayshon Gadison
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
