Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Frieman v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company et al
as 1:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
Austin Frieman
Defendant:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company, John J. Lynch, Jr., Lawrence K. Fish and others
Williams v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company et al
as 1:2022cv01374
Plaintiff:
Amir Williams
Defendant:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company, John J. Lynch, Jr., Lawrence K. Fish and others
Justice v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company et al
as 1:2022cv01320
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Justice, II
Defendant:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company, John J. Lynch, Jr., Lawrence K. Fish and others
O'Dell v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company et al
as 1:2022cv01932
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company, John J. Lynch, Jr., Lawrence K. Fish and others
Stein v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company et al
as 1:2022cv01914
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company, John J. Lynch, Jr., Lawrence K. Fish and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Gilliam v. Lynch et al
as 1:2021cv05263
Defendant:
Patrick J. Lynch, CITY OF NEW YORK, Jane Doe NYPD Officer who ordered a Strawberry Shake and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Gilliam, Catherina Irving and Randy Grullon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kravcenko v. Oritani Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv08527
Defendant:
Nicholas Antonaccio, John J. Skelly, Jr., Kevin J. Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Kravcenko
Polakoff v. Oritani Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv08309
Defendant:
Nicholas Antonaccio, John J. Skelly, Jr., Kevin J. Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Penny Polakoff
Lynch v. East Coast Orthotic & Prosthetic Corp.
as 7:2016cv04033
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Lynch
Defendant:
East Coast Orthotic & Prosthetic Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
