Cases 71 - 80 of 136
Chanel, Inc. v. 2016 Charm Jewelry et al
as 0:2016cv61605
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
2016 Charm Jewelry, 2015 Fashion Electronic Shop, Aaron Shume Jewelry and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-12647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Burton v. J. M. Corney V.P. et al
as 3:2016cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Burton
Defendant:
J. M. Corney V.P., Corizon Health and Julie Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMillen v. Sarasota County Jail et al
as 8:2016cv01054
Plaintiff:
James Edgar McMillen
Defendant:
James Pitt, Jr., Kyle McNight and J. M. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Sanders v. T. Bascomb, et al
as 15-14988
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE J. SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
T. B. BASCOMB, in individual capacity and J. M. DOUGLAS, in individual capacity
Malla v. J&M Condo Management and Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv23417
Plaintiff:
Sreeram Malla
Defendant:
J&M Condo Management and Maintenance, Inc. and Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
MAJOR v. WOOD et al
as 0:2015cv61579
Plaintiff:
SARAH MAJOR
Defendant:
ALAN WOOD , J&M Tank Lines Inc and Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prater v. Jones et al
as 3:2015cv00810
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, J. Shunbert, Stuart K. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v.CRUTCHFIELD, et al
as 5:2015cv00150
Plaintiff:
AVION LAWSON
Defendant:
GAFFORD, J M CRUTCHFIELD, RICKY E SILCOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salas Martinez et al v. J M N Cleaning Services, Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv22014
Plaintiff:
Carlos Manuel Salas Martinez and Iris M. Garcia
Defendant:
J M N Cleaning Services, Corp. and Juan Suarez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
