Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Franklin v. Doheny et al
as 1:2020cv00053
Defendant:
Lawrence R. Codey, Richard L. Wambold, Jerome A. Peribere and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Franklin, Jr.
Nominal Defendant:
Sealed Air Corporation
PARSHALL v. SUN BANCORP, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv07368
Plaintiff:
PAUL PARSHALL
Defendant:
SUN BANCORP, INC., ANTHONY R. COSCIA, JEFFREY S. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CHETCUTI v. SUN BANCORP, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv07329
Plaintiff:
PAUL CHETCUTI
Defendant:
SUN BANCORP, INC., JEFFREY S. BROWN, SIDNEY R. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Marino et al v. Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00240
Defendant:
Sanofi U.S. Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Hospira Worldwide, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Marino and Erasmo J. Marino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARINO v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40310
Plaintiff:
CARLO J. MARINO
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Kenneth Marino v. Applied Bank, et al
as 09-4005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH J. MARINO
Defendant - Appellee:
APPLIED BANK, FKA Cross Country Bank, APPLIED CARD SYS INC and ROCCO A. ABESSINIO
MARINO et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES et al
as 2:2007cv68323
Plaintiff:
FRANK P. MARINO and MARIE J. MARINO
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, ASBESTOS CLAIMS FACILITY, JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Marino v. Cross Country Bank et al
as 1:2007cv00426
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Marino
Defendant:
Cross Country Bank and Applied Card Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
MARINO v. CROSS COUNTRY BANK et al
as 2:2007cv01389
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. MARINO
Defendant:
CROSS COUNTRY BANK and APPLIED CARD SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
