Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Zambala v. Smith
as 1:2023cv05324
Petitioner:
Edgar Zambala
Respondent:
Brandon J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stepherson v. Haaland et al
as 1:2022cv09202
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Stepherson Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in Propia Persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae doing business as Jamal El Trust
Defendant:
Debra Anne Haaland doing business as Debra Anne Haaland, Andrew Marshall Saul, Brian Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Montes v. Smith
as 9:2022cv01021
Petitioner:
Germaine Montes
Respondent:
Bradon J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guzman v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Jose Guzman
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Brandon J. Smith and Ms. A. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Smith v. Oliver et al
as 1:2021cv01278
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Smith
Defendant:
K. Oliver, K. Alajko and Anthony Annucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joaquin v. Smith
as 1:2021cv09372
Petitioner:
Miguel E. Joaquin
Respondent:
Warden Brandon J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. People of the State of New York
as 1:2021cv07501
Petitioner:
Charles J. Smith
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Albritton v. Smith
as 1:2021cv03300
Respondent:
Brandon J. Smith
Petitioner:
Jemal Albritton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Noeth
as 6:2020cv06954
Respondent:
Joseph Noeth
Petitioner:
Damion J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shamsuddin v. Smith
as 9:2020cv00955
Petitioner:
Latif Shamsuddin
Respondent:
Brandon J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
