Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PATTERSON v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2019cv00897
Defendant:
MICHAEL DUGGAN, JEFFREY ATKINS, SCOTT S. HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SAULS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2018cv02232
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, WILLIAM J. SMITH, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Plaintiff:
SHONDA SAULS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2016cv00209
Plaintiff:
ANDRE RICHARDSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. SMITH , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and JOHN DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. JACKS et al
as 1:2015cv01990
Plaintiff:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
IMAN JACKS, LASHEEKA R. DIXON, ALFRED L. HAYES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv00161
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , WILLIAM J. SMITH and JOHN DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SMITH
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2009cv00618
Plaintiff:
ANGELA J. SMITH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00594
Plaintiff:
ANGELA J. SMITH
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. and UNITY HEALTHCARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. SMYTH et al
as 1:2007cv01090
Plaintiff:
THERESA SMALL SMITH
Defendant:
ANN SMYTH, EDITH H. SMYTHE, KAREN SMYTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED GOV SEC/INTL v. US MARSHAL SERVICE
as 1:2002cv01484
Plaintiff:
UNITED GOVERNMENT SECURITY OFFICERS OF AMERICA INTERNATIONAL UNION , ANN J. BARKLEY , WILLIAM J. BURGE and others
Defendant:
AKAL SECURITY, INC. and ARES GROUP INCORPORATED
Counter_claimant:
AKAL SECURITY, INC. and ARES GROUP INCORPORATED
Counter_defendant:
HARLEN D. COY , DON E. KEMP , KEITH MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
