Cases 11 - 20 of 28
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv00161
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , WILLIAM J. SMITH and JOHN DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SMITH
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
SPEIGHT-BEY v. SMITH
as 1:2014cv02016
Respondent:
WILLIAM J. SMITH
Petitioner:
MORRIS SPEIGHT-BEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2013cv01162
Petitioner:
TYE J. SMITH
Respondent:
JOHN DAVIS, COLORADO STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAGBY v. CHU et al
as 1:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC WAYNE BAGBY
Defendant:
SHARON Y. CHU, VANESSA D. GILMORE, ANDREW J. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAHEEN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2012cv01168
Plaintiff:
DAVID T. SHAHEEN
Defendant:
CHARLES J. SMITH and HOW 2 GO PUBLIC.COM INC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
TEDDY-LAWRENCE v. STATE OF MICHIGAN INC., et al
as 1:2010cv01786
Plaintiff:
TEDDY-LAWRENCE
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN INC., COUNTY OF MACOMB, INC., CITY OF ROSEVILLE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2010cv00653
Plaintiff:
ANGELA J. SMITH and GILBERT SAMPSON SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. FENTY et al
as 1:2009cv00748
Plaintiff:
PHILLIPPE L. SMITH
Defendant:
A. FENTY, D. BROWN, UNKNOWN ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF THE D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2009cv00618
Plaintiff:
ANGELA J. SMITH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
