Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DURBIN v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv03222
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL DURBIN
Defendant:
NANCY PATRICIA PELOSI, CHARLES ELLIS SCHUMER, ADDISON MITCHELL MCCONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MAHONEY v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD et al
as 1:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
Reverend PATRICK J. MAHONEY and PATRICK J. MAHONEY
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD, KAREN H. GIBSON, WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MAHONEY v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv02314
Plaintiff:
PATRICK J. MAHONEY
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD, KAREN H. GIBSON, WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MUSGRAVE v. MANGER et al
as 1:2021cv02199
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MUSGRAVE
Defendant:
J. THOMAS MANGER, CAPITOL POLICE, WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NOONER v. MILLER et al
as 1:2019cv00338
Defendant:
J. LEON HOLMES, JERRY W. CAVANEAU, BETH DEER and others
Plaintiff:
TERRICK NOONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2014cv01417
Plaintiff:
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL , ADVOCATE SHERMAN HOSPITAL , ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
MUHAMMAD v. DINE et al
as 1:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
KIM C. DINE, MICHAEL CONOVER, TIMI ANN CONOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKENZIE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00458
Plaintiff:
NOLAN MCKENZIE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARACK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KANSAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MACHIE v. MANGER et al
as 1:2009cv01359
Plaintiff:
EDMOND K. MACHIE
Defendant:
J. THOMAS MANGER, NANCY DEMME, PAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
