Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Anderson v. Colorado Department of Corrections
as 1:2020cv01773
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Anderson
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mardis v. Falk et al
as 1:2014cv02895
Petitioner:
Alexander S. Mardis
Respondent:
James Falk, Rick Raemisch, J. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Lane
as 5:2014cv00298
Plaintiff:
Robert J Anderson, III
Defendant:
Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hover v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2013cv01482
Plaintiff:
David J. Hover
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Roger Werholz, James Falk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perales et al v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2011cv02172
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States Internal Revenue Service, USA, U.S. Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderson v. Utah Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00137
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Anderson
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections, Utah State Prison, Steven Turley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Marcus et al
as 5:2008cv03167
Plaintiff:
Robert J Anderson
Defendant:
J Marcus, Rick Honeycutt and Sam Cline
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. Riggin et al
as 5:2008cv03154
Plaintiff:
Robert J Anderson
Defendant:
David Riggin, Sam Cline and (fnu) Marcus
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. Sterling Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2007cv02274
Petitioner:
Donald J. Anderson
Respondent:
Sterling Correctional Facility and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Colorado Attorney General
as 1:2007cv00453
Petitioner:
Donald J. Anderson
Respondent:
Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
