Cases filed in Texas
Andrews v. Dir TDCJ We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00051
Petitioner: Richard J Andrews
Respondent: Dir TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andrews et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00089
Plaintiff: Michael J. Andrews and Kimberly A. Andrews
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master: Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrews Wolfson v. McDonald
as 6:2015cv00243
Plaintiff: Susan J. Andrews Wolfson
Defendant: Robert McDonald
Notice Only Party: U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 1975 Recovery of Servicemen's Group Life Insurance - Jurisdiction of District Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01340
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Anderson et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv02704
Plaintiff: Gerald D. Anderson, Emma J. Andrews, Ralph A. Baughman and others
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plunkett et al v. Anka (Cortez Hill), LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00379
Plaintiff: Donald J. Plunkett and J. Andrew English
Defendant: Anka (Cortez Hill), LLC, Anka Developments, Inc. and Pacific Marketing Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01176
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Contract None
Andrew vs Quarterman
as 7:2007cv00190
Plaintiff: Darnell J. Andrew
Defendant: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrew v. Quarterman
as 7:2007mc00038
Plaintiff: Darnell J. Andrew
Defendant: Nathaniel Quarterman

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?