Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Benavidez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Ernesto J Benavidez
Respondent:
Ronald Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Latten v. Benavidez et al
as 2:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
William Angelo Latten, Jr
Defendant:
J. Benavidez, Y Salinas-Gonzalez, H Oritz-Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Zeigler v. Benavidez
as 2:2023cv01365
Petitioner:
Anthony Lavel Zeigler
Respondent:
J. Benavidez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zeigler v. Benavidez
as 3:2023cv03370
Petitioner:
Anthony Lavel Zeigler
Respondent:
J. Benavidez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kohen Uhuru v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 23-15661
Petitioner / Appellant:
KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, AKA Priest, AKA Diallo Earl Uhuru
Respondent / Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, J. BENAVIDEZ, Warden and ROBERT BURTON, Warden
Bonilla v. Benavidez
as 3:2022cv01924
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
J. Benavidez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Uhuru v. Allison et al
as 2:2022cv02024
Petitioner:
Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison, J. Benavidez and Robert Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. Benavidez et al
as 3:2022cv01766
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
J. Benavidez, John Whitson, Jonathan Goodfellow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Benavidez
as 4:2022cv04931
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Respondent:
J. Benavidez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Uhuru v. Benavidez et al
as 2:2022cv00784
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo Uhuru and Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
J. Benavidez, J. Garry, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
