Cases filed in California
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Stephen L Murphy v. Daniel J Buckley et al
as 2:2011cv10112
Defendant: Honorable Judge Daniel J Buckley and Rubiya Nur
Plaintiff: Mr Stephen L Murphy
John Edward Mitchell v J Marshall et al
as 2:2010cv07351
Defendant: S BojaAH, C J Buckley, L Buckley and others
Plaintiff: John Edward Mitchell
Glass v. Scribner, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv05953
Plaintiff: Donald Glass
Defendant: A K Scribner, K Anderson, C Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Lawrence Snoke v. Superior Court of California et al
as 2:2009cv03292
Plaintiff: Brian Lawrence Snoke
Defendant: Superior Court of California and Daniel J. Buckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
De Shazo v. Hieng et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01258
Plaintiff: De Shazo
Defendant: Hieng, L. Cano, J Buckley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haney v. Bondoc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01222
Plaintiff: Monte Haney
Defendant: J. Bondoc, E. Garnett, Yasuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haney v. Bondoc et al
as 2:2007cv01510
Plaintiff: Monte Haney
Defendant: J. Bondoc, E. Garnett, Yasuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haney v. Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01104
Plaintiff: Monte Haney
Defendant: Darrel G Adams, T. Heing, L - Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haney v. Adams et al
as 2:2007cv01322
Plaintiff: Monte Haney
Defendant: Darrel G Adams, T. Heing, L - Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Shazo -v- Hieng et.al.
as 5:2007cv00131
Plaintiff: De Shazo
Defendant: Hieng, L. Cano, J. Buckley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?