Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 168
Porter v. Giles et al
as 2:2010cv02483
Petitioner: Ontourus Frondesse Porter
Respondent: J. C. Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Denton v. Giles et al
as 3:2010cv02486
Petitioner: Ricky Walter Denton
Respondent: J C Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lawson v. Giles et al
as 7:2010cv02446
Petitioner: Lonnie Lawson
Respondent: J. C. Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sims v. Giles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00757
Plaintiff: David Richard Sims
Defendant: J. C. Giles, Troy King and The Alabama D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frazier v. Giles et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00707
Plaintiff: James Calvin Frazier
Defendant: J. C. Giles and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pleasant v. Giles et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00685
Plaintiff: Polanski Pleasant
Defendant: J. C. Giles and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Giles et al
as 5:2010cv02127
Petitioner: Kirk Lashia Jackson
Respondent: J. C. Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collins v. Giles et al (INMATE3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00630
Plaintiff: Fred K. Collins
Defendant: J. C. Giles and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kasier v. Giles et al
as 5:2010cv01967
Petitioner: David Kasier
Respondent: J. C. Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryant v. Giles et al
as 2:2010cv01866
Petitioner: Ulyesse Bryant
Respondent: J C Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?