Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Cook v. Samuel
as 3:2023cv04579
Petitioner:
Nathaniel J. Cook
Respondent:
Danny Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Cook v. Solano County Sheriff's Dept., et al.,
as 2:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Khary J. Cook
Defendant:
Solano County Sheriff's Department, B. Dewall, Hornbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 3:2020cv06955
Plaintiff:
Nour Abdelhady, Sam Smith, Jeffrey Mullins and others
Defendant:
Safeway, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, incorrectly designated as Doe 6, Kaiser Permanente International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Amber J. Cook v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv04851
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Amber J. Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Richard H. Bhimji v. D. Bowman et al
as 2:2019cv04502
Defendant:
E. Hansen, J. Cook, M. Duke and others
Plaintiff:
Richard H Bhimji
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hakim v. Wellpoint Asset Recovery LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00303
Defendant:
Stephan Barber and Law Firm of Ropers Majeski, Ken Madhvani, John Bradley, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul- Jalil al- Hakim and Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cook v. Solano County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2016cv00536
Plaintiff:
Khary J. Cook
Defendant:
Solano County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv05155
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Ramirez v. Paramo et al
as 3:2014cv01830
Plaintiff:
Saul Miranda Ramirez
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, Lori D. Zamora, Kyle Seely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heilman v. Cook et al
as 3:2014cv01412
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Heilman
Defendant:
J. Cook, J. Chau, R. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
