Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Albert Valdez v. Pleasant Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2016cv01599
Plaintiff:
Albert Valdez
Defendant:
Pleasant Valley State Prison, D. Fernandez, M. Conanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert Valdez v. Pleasant Valley State Prison et al
as 2:2016cv07615
Defendant:
Medical Doctor J. Chokatos, Medical Doctor J. Chokatos, Medical Doctor M. Conanan and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Valdez
Maciel v. CDCR, et al.
as 1:2016cv00996
Plaintiff:
Armando Maciel
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR, S. Frauenheim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solorzano v. Frauenheim, et al.
as 1:2016cv00314
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Solorzano
Defendant:
S. Frauenheim, Walker, R. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricks v. Onyeje et al
as 1:2015cv01148
Plaintiff:
Scott K. Ricks
Defendant:
O. Onyeje, J. Fortune, J. Chokatos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joel Holley v. M. Scott, et al
as 13-16651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL ANTHONY HOLLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
M. SCOTT, Officer, CSR, J. RANDLE, Correctional Counselor, Pleasant Valley State Prison, T. FELTON, RN, Pleasant Valley State Prison and others
Mathis v. Flores et al
as 1:2012cv01673
Plaintiff:
Bennie Mathis
Defendant:
E. Flores, A. Shittu, J. Chokatos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv01658
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Pleasant Valley State Prison Medical Department and J. Chokatos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatti v. Brazelton et al
as 1:2012cv01452
Plaintiff:
Aaron Wayne Gatti
Defendant:
P. D. Brazelton, L. D. Zamora, P. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holley v. Scott et al
as 2:2012cv01213
Plaintiff:
Joel Holley
Defendant:
M. Scott, T. Felton, J. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
