Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Michael Lujan v. ODOC, et al
as 19-35403
Defendant / Appellee:
TROY BOWSER, Warden, COLLETTE PETERS, MONTOYA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. LUJAN
James Ross v. Steven Shelton, et al
as 19-35247
Defendant / Appellee:
J. DAFOE, Health Services Administrator, STEVEN SHELTON, SHANNON JOHNSTON, Nurse Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR ROSS
Richard Gurule v. Jeri Taylor, et al
as 18-35544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD EVERETT LEE GURULE
Defendant - Appellee:
JERI TAYLOR, D. WETTLAUFER, D. LOZIER and others
Donohue v. Hughes et al
as 2:2018cv00804
Defendant:
A. Clements, R.N., J. Dafoe, R.N., Garth Gulick, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Patrick Donohue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Shelton
as 2:2018cv00045
Defendant:
J. Dafoe, Shannon Johnston, Steven Shelton and others
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujan v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv01726
Defendant:
Dr. Beamer, Troy Bowser, J. Bugher and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lujan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCright v. Beamer et al
as 2:2017cv00942
Defendant:
5 John and 5 Jane Does, Dr. Leland Beamer, J. Dafoe and others
Plaintiff:
Larry McCright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singh v. Gruenwald et al
as 2:2017cv00829
Defendant:
J. Dafoe, C. Dieter, S. Franke and others
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Stancliff et al
as 1:2017cv00589
Defendant:
C. Bolles, S. Brown, E. Bucher and others
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Whelan et al
as 2:2016cv01929
Defendant:
C. Conley, J. Dafoe, C. Dieter and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
