Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hampton et al v. Cortez et al
as 3:2023cv01542
Plaintiff:
Rufus J. Hampton, III, Fred Johnson, Terry Mays and others
Defendant:
Patrick Page Cortez, Clay Schexnayder and John Bel Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bordenave v. Delta Air Lines, Inc
as 3:2018cv00637
Plaintiff:
George E. Bordenave, Jr.
Defendant:
Delta Air Lines, Inc
Notice Only:
Gerald J. Hampton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hampton v. Cain et al
as 5:2014cv03309
Plaintiff:
Rufus J Hampton, III
Defendant:
Burl Cain, James M Lablanc and James Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hampton v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00730
Respondent:
Burl Cain, James Caldwell and James M. LaBlanc
Petitioner:
Rufus J. Hampton, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hampton v. Sanders
as 3:2014cv00623
Plaintiff:
Rufus J. Hampton, III
Defendant:
Nick Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 5:2012cv00820
Plaintiff:
Rufus J Hampton, III
Defendant:
Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hampton v. Jindal et al
as 3:2011cv00238
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Shirley Coody, Trish Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Rufus J. Hampton, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Sanders
as 3:2011cv00171
Plaintiff:
Rufus J. Hampton, III
Defendant:
Nick Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Cain et al
as 3:2010cv00544
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Bobby Jindal and James M. LaBlanc
Plaintiff:
Rufus J. Hampton, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2007cv00978
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Allen, Beatrice Alvarez, Clara Axtell and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Pharmaceutic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
