Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dallas Hartley, Jr. v. Southern Health Partners, et al
as 19-6418
Defendant / Appellee: CARTER COUNTY, TN and SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS
Plaintiff / Appellant: DALLAS J. HARTLEY, JR.
United States of America v. Produce Exch. of L.A., et al
as 2:2019mc00097
Defendant: Willardson Co., Inc., Sidney Feldstein, Southern California Egg Council and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Hartley v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 2:2017mc00015
Plaintiff: Dallas J Hartley, Jr
Defendant: Southern Health Partners, Metropolitan Gov't of Elizabethton and Carter County
United States of America v. Hartley
as 8:2014mc00049
Petitioner: United States of America
Respondent: Michael J. Hartley
Alfred Toliver v. Board of Parole Hearings, et al
as 11-55038
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALFRED TOLIVER
Defendant - Appellee: BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION and J. HARTLEY, Warden
Alfred Toliver v. Board of Parole Hearings et al.
as 2:2010cv08792
Defendant: Board of Parole Hearings, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation and J. Hartley
Plaintiff: Alfred Toliver
Alfred Toliver v. Board of Parole Hearings et al
as 2:2010cv07093
Defendant: Board of Parole Hearings, California Department Corrections & Rehabilitation and J. Hartley
Plaintiff: Alfred Toliver
Miguel Mario Lam v. J. Hartley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv05327
Respondent: J. Hartley
Petitioner: Miguel Mario Lam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oswaldo Enrique Vasquez v. J Hartley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2008cv00986
Respondent: J Hartley
Petitioner: Oswaldo Enrique Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Colt v. J. Hartley
as 09-70848
Petitioner: THOMAS MICHAEL COLT
Respondent: J. HARTLEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?