Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MOHAMMED v. COOPER et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MOHAMMED
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER COOPER, BERYL A. HOWELL, JAMES BOASBERG and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
HARDAWAY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2019cv02142
Defendant:
D.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DOES 1-25, RICHARD J. LEON and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELENE HARDAWAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NOONER v. MILLER et al
as 1:2019cv00338
Defendant:
J. LEON HOLMES, JERRY W. CAVANEAU, BETH DEER and others
Plaintiff:
TERRICK NOONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE v. ROBERTS et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2013cv01963
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE , JOSE JUHUDA GARCIA , MARINNA L. CALLAWAY and others
Defendant:
RICHARD W. ROBERTS , EMMET G. SULLIVAN , COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEWLETT v. LEON et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2011cv00872
Plaintiff:
DARRELL W. HEWLETT
Defendant:
RICHARD J. LEON, JOHN DOE, CHRISTINE BRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIBLEY v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2010cv01696
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, JOHN G. ROBERTS, SAMUEL ANTHONY ALITO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.