Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Donnelly LeBlanc v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 20-2668
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNELLY J. LEBLANC
Donnelly LeBlanc v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 17-1094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNELLY J. LEBLANC
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
LEBLANC v. TRICE et al
as 5:2016cv01044
Petitioner:
DONNELLY J. LEBLANC
Respondent:
ERIC TRICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEBLANC v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2014cv05783
Petitioner:
DONNELLY J. LEBLANC
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donnelly LeBlanc v. Craig Stedman, et al
as 11-4624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNELLY J. LEBLANC
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG STEDMAN, BRIAN E. CHUDZIK, THOMAS ZELL and others
Donnelly LeBlanc v. Larry Snavely, et al
as 11-3608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNELLY J. LEBLANC
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY SNAVELY and KRISTOPHER M. KELLER
LEBLANC v. SNAVELY et al
as 5:2011cv05672
Plaintiff:
DONNELLY J. LEBLANC
Defendant:
LARRY SNAVELY and KRISTOPHER M. KELLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEBLANC v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42774
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. LEBLANC
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Donnelly LeBlanc v. Craig Stedman
as 11-2927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNELLY J. LEBLANC
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG STEDMAN, BRIAN E. CHUDZIK, THOMAS ZELL and others
LEBLANC et al v. NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60731
Plaintiff:
ALIBA J. LEBLANC and VELMA LEBLANC
Defendant:
NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
