Cases 1 - 9 of 9
KENNEDY v. ROMANO et al
as 5:2018cv03648
Defendant:
JOHN KOSKINEN, NANCY B. ROMANO, BRUCE K. MENEELY and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENNEDY v. HANNA et al
as 5:2018cv00977
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Defendant:
JOSEPH N. HANNA, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY v. MULDOWNEY et al
as 5:2017cv04599
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Defendant:
JAMES T. MULDOWNEY, STEPHEN J. MARSHALL, JAMES K. REILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv04579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MARSHALL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55434
Plaintiff:
PETER J. MARSHALL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MARSHALL v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33043
Plaintiff:
PETER J. MARSHALL and PETER J. MARSHALL
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MARSHALL v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77713
Plaintiff:
BETTY J MARSHALL and BETTY J MARSHALL
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MARSHALL v. A-BEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv73555
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. MARSHALL, JAMES J. MARSHALL, JAMES J. MARSHALL and others
Defendant:
A-BEX CORPORATION, A-BEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD., ATLAS TURNER, INC., LAC D'AMIANTE DU QUEBEC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MARSHALL et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv61806
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. MARSHALL and HATTIE MARSHALL
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A C AND S, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
