Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Osborne v. Jon B. Sage, P. A.
as 0:2017cv62423
Plaintiff:
Harold J. Osborne, Sr.
Defendant:
Jon B. Sage, P. A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Masters v. Bender et al
as 1:2016cv02880
Plaintiff:
Alison D Masters
Defendant:
Michael B Bender , James P Carney , Richard K Greaves and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Osborne v. Absolute Collections Corporation
as 0:2016cv62113
Plaintiff:
Harold J. Osborne, Sr.
Defendant:
Absolute Collections Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OSBORNE v. OSBORNE et al
as 1:2016cv00415
Plaintiff:
JOEL DAVID OSBORNE
Defendant:
DANIEL J. OSBORNE, MARK A. HAYDEN, CHRISTOPHER BOSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Osborne v. Gila, LLC
as 0:2015cv62585
Plaintiff:
Harold J. Osborne, Sr.
Defendant:
Gila, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Osborne v. Aargon Agency, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv62569
Plaintiff:
Harold J. Osborne, Sr.
Defendant:
Aargon Agency, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wagner et al
as 8:2014cv01036
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Walter D Wagner and Alexander J Osborn
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Octane Bar & Grill LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00537
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Octane Bar & Grill LLC, Michael A. Osborne and Kellie J. Osborne
Cause Of Action: Unauthorized Publication or Use of Communications
Alderton, et al v. Crown Cork Seal Co, et al
as 1:1994cv01034
Plaintiff:
John R. Alderton , Jacquelin F. Alderton , Richard W. Armistaed and others
Defendant:
Crown Cork and Seal Company , Asbestos Claims Management Corporation and Lloyd L. Crocker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
