Cases 1 - 10 of 13
PATTERSON v. CHEMTURA CORPORATION, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv06626
Plaintiff:
DARCY J. PATTERSON
Defendant:
CHEMTURA CORPORATION, INC. , CRAIG A. ROGERSON , JEFFREY D. BENJAMIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
BISHOP ANTHONEE J. PATTERSON v. SHELTON et al
as 2:2016mc00168
Plaintiff:
BISHOP ANTHONEE J. PATTERSON
Defendant:
KENNETH SHELTON , JOHN CARLTON SHELTON THOMAS , LEON BLIGEN and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ESKRIDGE v. BAKER et al
as 2:2012cv00964
Plaintiff:
LAKENYA ESKRIDGE
Defendant:
JOHNNIE BAKER , DEBORAH BROWN , ARLENE HELEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONOVER v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv06946
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONOVER
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, LEROY D. NUNERY, WARREN G. HARDING MIDDLE SCHOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv53708
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. PATTERSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PATTERSON v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67033
Plaintiff:
WILMA J. PATTERSON
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTERSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57396
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. PATTERSON, III
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
v. PATTERSON et al
as 2:2010cv39570
Defendant:
OLIVER J. PATTERSON , A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PATTERSON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77722
Plaintiff:
BETTY J PATTERSON and BETTY J PATTERSON
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
