Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Barzee v. Abdulla et al
as 7:2023cv02328
Plaintiff:
Saio Barzee
Defendant:
Sing Sing C.O. A.M. Abdulla, Sing Sing C.O. E. Torres, Sing Sing C.O. V. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. State of New York et al
as 9:2017cv01014
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Taylor
Defendant:
State of New York, Coxsackie Correctional Facility Medical Department, J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saracina v. New York State et al
as 9:2017cv00864
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Saracina
Defendant:
New York State, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Dale G. Dubrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Polizzi et al
as 9:2017cv00377
Plaintiff:
William D. Thomas
Defendant:
Polizzi, Louis Pingotti, Jamie M. LaManna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pingotti et al
as 9:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
William A. Thomas
Defendant:
L. Pingotti, G. Gardner, J. Taylor-Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quiles v. J. Bobbi et al
as 9:2016cv01173
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Quiles
Defendant:
J. Bobbi, J. Taylor and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quiles v. J. Bobbi et al
as 1:2016cv00703
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Quiles
Defendant:
J. Bobbi, J. Taylor and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunn v. Abrunzo et al
as 6:2016cv06206
Plaintiff:
Darrell Gunn
Defendant:
William J. Abrunzo, Anthony J. Annucci, R. J. Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quiles v. Great Meadow C.F. et al
as 1:2013cv05871
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Quiles
Defendant:
Great Meadow C.F., John Doe, J. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quiles v. Great Meadow Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2013cv04901
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Quiles
Defendant:
Great Meadow Correctional Facility, J. Taylor, P. Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
