Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Clark v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2014at01099
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , Nevada Department of Corrections, R Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2014cv02066
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , Nevada Department of Corrections, Roderick Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manriquez v. Tilton, et al
as 1:2011cv00537
Plaintiff:
Daniel Manriquez
Defendant:
James Tilton, J. Woodford, Sue Hubbart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervantes v. Woodford et al
as 1:2009cv01863
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Cervantes
Defendant:
J. Woodford, James A. Yates, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cade v. Woodford, et al.
as 1:2009cv00538
Defendant:
D. Nelson, A Galindo, E - Duran and others
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Cade
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gay v. Woodford et al
as 3:2008cv04472
Plaintiff:
Omar Sharrieff Gay
Defendant:
J. Woodford, Mike S. Evans, Larry E. Scribner and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Avratin v. Woodford et al
as 3:2008cv01533
Plaintiff:
Adam Sean Avratin
Defendant:
J Woodford, Larry Small, S Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tatum v. McGuiness et al
as 1:2008cv00925
Plaintiff:
Willie Tatum
Defendant:
W.J. McGuiness, D.G. Adams, J. Woodford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tatum v. McGuiness et al
as 2:2008cv01400
Plaintiff:
Willie Tatum
Defendant:
W.J. McGuiness, D.G. Adams, J. Woodford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Manriquez v. Tilton et al
as 3:2008cv02427
Plaintiff:
Daniel Manriquez
Defendant:
James Tilton, J. Woodford, Sue Hubbart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
