Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Nichols v. litscher et al
as 1:2017cv00662
Petitioner:
James S Nichols
Respondent:
john litscher, Wisconsin Department of Justice and J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy, Wayne v. J.B. Van Hollen
as 3:2015cv00504
Petitioner:
Wayne D. Murphy
Respondent:
J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller, Anthony v. Van Hollen, J.B.
as 3:2014cv00887
Petitioner:
Anthony Todd Miller
Respondent:
J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jurjens, Ralph v. Van Hollen, J.B.
as 3:2014cv00462
Petitioner:
Ralph H. Jurjens, III
Respondent:
J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jacobs, Chris v. Van Hollen, J.B. et al
as 3:2014cv00126
Plaintiff:
Chris Jacobs
Defendant:
J.B. Van Hollen , Jill Falstad , Lemount Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson, Willie v. Walker, Scott et al
as 3:2013cv00776
Plaintiff:
Willie Simpson
Defendant:
Scott Walker , J.B. Van Hollen , Edward F. Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covington, Reo v. Pollard, William et al
as 3:2013cv00420
Petitioner:
Reo L. Covington
Respondent:
William J. Pollard and J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Godwin, Roger v. Haines, Tim et al
as 3:2013cv00339
Petitioner:
Roger Dale Godwin
Respondent:
Tim Haines , Edward F. Wall and J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCormack, Alan v. Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2012cv00924
Plaintiff:
Alan David McCormack
Defendant:
Department of Corrections , Division of Adult Institutions, Gary Hamblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Konitzer, Donna v. Secretary of Department of Corrections, et al
as 3:2012cv00874
Plaintiff:
Donna Dawn Konitzer
Defendant:
Secretary of Department of Corrections , Greg Grams, Timothy Douma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
