Cases 1 - 10 of 16
RevoLaze LLC v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00043
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company, Inc. and J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
RevoLaze LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plano Encryption Technologies, LLC v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plano Encryption Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Johnson v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv00722
Plaintiff:
Nathan P Johnson
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Myron E. Ullman, III and Kenneth H. Hannah
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pi-Net International, Inc. v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.
as 2:2013cv01035
Plaintiff:
Pi-Net International, Inc.
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Gilbert v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00810
Plaintiff:
Shawn Gilbert
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Myron E. Ullman, III and Kenneth H. Hannah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Erdem v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00750
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Myron E. Ullman, III and Kenneth H. Hannah
Plaintiff:
Erhan Erdem
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Marcus v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00736
Plaintiff:
Alan B. Marcus
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Myron E. Ullman, III and Kenneth H. Hannah
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Arunachalam v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00605
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Eclipse IP LLC v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Eclipse IP LLC
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
