Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Begin v. Air & Liquid System Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00830
Defendant:
CSR, Ltd, Air & Liquid System Corporation, Rockwell Automation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ginny Begin and William D. Begin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Presley v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00712
Defendant:
Meadwestvaco Corp., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Bucyrus International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Rockwell Automation, Inc., United Technologies Corporation, CNA Holdings, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
The Gorman-Rupp Company, Pneumo Abex Corporation, Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie K. Presley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Tracy et al v. 3M et al
as 3:2014cv00705
Defendant:
3M, CSR, Ltd., Teledyne Technologies Incorporated and others
Cross Defendant:
Piper Aircraft, Inc., Dewitt Products Co., Goodrich Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Giola Tracy and Bryce Tracy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Shaab vs. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al
as 1:2013cv01334
Plaintiff:
Gene Shaab
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Ameron International Corporation, Bechtel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Payne v. A. W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2011cv00820
Defendant:
3M, Uniroyal Holding, Inc, Crane Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baker v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00008
Plaintiff:
Thomas Franklin Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Aldrich Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ALDRICH, DONALD v. A.C. AND S., INC.
as 3:1997cv00412
Plaintiff:
Donald Aldrich , Ernest Crotteau , Leonard Firkus and others
Defendant:
The Anchor Packing Company , A.W. Chesterton Company , Ltd. Csr and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
