Cases 11 - 20 of 43
STEINHARTER v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
as 3:2019cv06285
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
Plaintiff:
RIVKA STEINHARTER
FARZAN v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. et al
as 3:2019cv05156
Defendant:
STACY E. SPOHN, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC., J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
REZA FARZAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VERIZON EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE v. VALERIE O'CONNOR et al
as 3:2019cv04441
Plaintiff:
VERIZON EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE
Defendant:
VALERIE O'CONNOR, ALEXIS O'CONNOR, J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
KACHUR et al v. WMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2018cv15111
Defendant:
US BANK, N.A., ISSUING ENTITY TRUST J.P. MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST 2006-WMC4, DOES 1-100 INCLUSIVE and others
Plaintiff:
MARY J. KACHUR and PETER J. KACHUR
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv12976
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MAMAN v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
as 3:2018cv05815
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL MAMAN
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
REYES v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A. et al
as 2:2018cv02638
Plaintiff:
LOUISA L REYES
Defendant:
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A., FEDERAL HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION, J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
CRYSTAL v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
as 3:2017cv05062
Plaintiff:
CHANA CRYSTAL
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
OGBEBOR et al v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 3:2016cv03400
Plaintiff:
BOSE OGBEBOR and ALICE OMORGIE
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., M&T BANK and BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
