Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Luna v. J.S. Held LLC et. al.
as 2:2021cv03072
Defendant:
J.S. Held LLC and J.S. Held Engineering Services PLLC
Plaintiff:
Monica Luna
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DOGLIO v. SLAY TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00346
Defendant:
SLAY INDUSTRIES, J.S. LEASING CO., INC., SLAY TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARCOS D DOGLIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
De Jesus v. J.S. Weipz Enterprises Inc
as 8:2019cv01729
Plaintiff:
Robert De Jesus
Defendant:
J.S. Weipz Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Ruiz v. J.S. Septic Services Corp
as 4:2017cv01186
Plaintiff:
Javier Ruiz
Defendant:
J.S. Septic Services Corp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Pelayo v. J.S. Plastering, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv14473
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Pelayo
Defendant:
J.S. Plastering, Inc. and Jerome E. Staggenborg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Andino v. J.S. Baum Floor Covering and Housefurnishing Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05335
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Andino
Defendant:
J.S. Baum Floor Covering and Housefurnishing Inc., Jeffrey Baum and Howard Baum
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Morici-Goldstein v. J.S. McHugh, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03095
Defendant:
J.S. McHugh, Inc. and Jeffrey B. Mulhall
Plaintiff:
Sarah Morici-Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv08696
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alvarado v. J.S. Contractor of Tampa, Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv01717
Plaintiff:
Anrulfo Alvarado
Defendant:
J.S. Contractor of Tampa, Inc. and Edwin Pena-Paulino
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carlos Tejada v. J.S. Greene Associates et al
as 2:2008cv08155
Plaintiff:
Carlos Tejada and Carlos Tejada
Defendant:
J.S. Greene Associates, J.S. Greene Associates, Lisa Villareal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
