Cases 1 - 10 of 10
STOKES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv03989
Plaintiff:
JACQUAR STOKES
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ERIC MILSTEIN and SGT. KEVIN UMBACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOKES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2022cv05029
Petitioner:
JACQUAR STOKES
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STOKES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 1:2022cv02976
Petitioner:
JACQUAR STOKES
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, COMMISSIONER OF PHILADELPHIA OF PRISON DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STOKES v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv02906
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
JACQUAR STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STOKES v. LANIGAN
as 1:2017cv12098
Plaintiff:
JACQUAR STOKES
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOKES v. BOND et al
as 1:2016cv04818
Plaintiff:
JACQUAR STOKES
Defendant:
WILLIE BOND, MARK ROMANO, MACK SELBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOKES v. LAGANA
as 1:2013cv04337
Petitioner:
JACQUAR STOKES
Respondent:
PAUL K. LAGANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MIL'CHAMOT et al v. LANIGAN
as 3:2012cv03834
Plaintiff:
YEHUDAH TZIYON KE'ISH MIL'CHAMOT, JACQUAR STOKES, JAQUISE WOOSON and others
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STOKES v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2012cv01478
Plaintiff:
JACQUAR STOKES
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN and CHARLES WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOKES v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2011cv00407
Plaintiff:
JACQUAR STOKES
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, SCO SHEPPARD, SCO JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
