Cases 81 - 90 of 294
Williams et al v. Menard Correctional Center et al
as 3:2018cv01693
Defendant:
Major Westfall, Officer Kramer, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Vonsean K. Williams, Heather Hood, Marshall Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2018cv01692
Defendant:
H. Johnson, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Cody Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Lashbrook et al
as 1:2018cv06065
Petitioner:
Shawn Henderson and Shaun Henderson
Respondent:
Jacklinquine Lashbrook and Jacqueline Lashbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Prince et al
as 3:2018cv01675
Plaintiff:
William Williams
Defendant:
Scott Prince, Jacqueline Lashbrook and John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2018cv01546
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections and Jacqueline Lashbrook
Plaintiff:
DeAnthony Evans Williamson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norfleet v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv01524
Defendant:
Frank Lawrence, Larue Love, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Norfleet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emanuel Rivera-Martinez v. Jacqueline Lashbrook
as 18-2777
Petitioner - Appellant:
EMANUEL RIVERA-MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK
Morris v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2018cv01504
Defendant:
Ms. Goldman, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Ms. Huey and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv01478
Defendant:
William A. Spiller, Kent Brookman, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley Boclair v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, et al
as 18-2689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY BOCLAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, Warden, SUSAN M. HILL, Correctional Counselor, JOHN BALDWIN, Acting Director of Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
