Cases 1 - 10 of 256
USA v. Jamares Jordan
as 24-11182
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMARES LEVELL JORDAN
Scott v. White
as 1:2024cv01570
Petitioner:
Jamar Scott
Respondent:
Jermaine White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kellyman v. Fairway Independent Mortgage Co.
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jamar O. Kellyman
Defendant:
Fairway Independent Mortgage Co. Its agents Its Attorney(s) of record, et al doing business as Homefinity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
USA v. Jamar Nattiel, et al
as 24-10954
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMAR BRANDON NATTIEL, PALACIO FARLEY and JOASSAINT JOSIAH ARISTIL
Mann v. Lindsey et al
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Gerard Jamar Mann
Defendant:
J. Lindsey, Tomlin, S. Best and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boatwright v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Jamar Antonio Boatwright
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Patrick Pat Labat and Fulton County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALDWIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33799
Plaintiff:
JAMAR BALDWIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MURRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25511
Plaintiff:
JAMAR MURRAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HECTOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23231
Plaintiff:
JAMAR HECTOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MYERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19229
Plaintiff:
JAMAR MYERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
