Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Clark v. Jamison
as 1:2023cv01140
Petitioner:
James Edward Clark
Respondent:
Warden Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clark v. Pliler
as 1:2022cv03451
Petitioner:
James E. Clark
Respondent:
W. S. Pliler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clark v. Pliler
as 1:2022cv03193
Petitioner:
James Edward Clark
Respondent:
W.S. Pliler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv06497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Keyes v. Groder et al
as 2:2017cv06434
Defendant:
Attorney James P Clarke, Judge S. M. Gianelli and Attorney Jeffrey Groder
Plaintiff:
Keysean L Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keyes v. Clarke et al
as 2:2017cv06128
Defendant:
Judge Thomas Adam, Attorney James P Clarke, County Court Attorney Legal Aid and others
Plaintiff:
Keysean L Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv06239
Defendant:
AVIS Rent a Car System, LLC, PV Holding Corp., TK Holding Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Clark v. Power Systems Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02785
Plaintiff:
James D Clark
Defendant:
Power Systems Services, Inc., O'Sheas Catering, LLC and Dickens Dining Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Jones v. Christ Temple Church et al
as 1:2016cv02202
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Christ Temple Church, Molly McKracken, Marinella Orinella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lebetkin v. Openpro, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05493
Plaintiff:
Steven Lebetkin
Defendant:
Openpro, Inc., James J. Clark, Shannon G. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ac Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
