Cases 1 - 10 of 21
James Green v. Romeo Aranas, et al
as 22-16926
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES HENRY GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
ROMEO ARANAS, RENE BAKER, JAMES COX and others
Green et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv07052
Plaintiff:
James Ruben Green, Darrell Wayne Terry, Sheila W. Beard and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Green, et al v. Monrovia Nursery Company
as 19-56425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RITA M. GREEN, JAMES M. GREEN and CECIL M. GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
MONROVIA NURSERY COMPANY, a California corporation
James M. Green et al v. Monrovia Nursery Company
as 2:2018cv05257
Plaintiff:
Cecil M. Green, James M. Green and Rita M. Green
Defendant:
Monrovia Nursery Company
Green v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00134
Defendant:
Brigitte Amsbury, Alifonso Cornejo, Jose Navarro and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James M. Green et al v. Monrovia Nursery Company
as 2:2017cv05761
Plaintiff:
Cecil M. Green, James M. Green and Rita M. Green
Defendant:
Monrovia Nursery Company
James Green v. Romeo Aranas, et al
as 14-16249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES HENRY GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROMEO ARANAS, RENE BAKER, JAMES COX and others
Green v. Baker et al
as 3:2014cv00261
Defendant:
Rene Baker, Debra Brooks, Ronald Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
James Henry Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Director/Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2014cv00965
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell Green
Defendant:
Director/Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Paramo, Ed Rozo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Green v. Eldon McDaniel, et al
as 14-15715
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES HENRY GREEN
Respondent - Appellee:
ELDON K. MCDANIEL, NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL and RENEE BAKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
