Cases 1 - 10 of 10
JOHNSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07729
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07735
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CAMDEN JAIL HOUSE FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06306
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN JAIL HOUSE FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hollingsworth
as 1:2014cv03099
Petitioner:
James Curtis Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Fairton Bureau Of Prisons-Fairton et al
as 1:2013cv01836
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
Fairton Bureau Of Prisons-Fairton, Warden Shartle, Case Manager Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv04838
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. JOHNSON, BILLY MCLEAN, MARCELLUS AUTREY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03057
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2007cv02827
Petitioner:
JAMES F. JOHNSON
Respondent:
E. DAVIS and S. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01549
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JOHNSON v. PACHOLSKI et al
as 1:2007cv00633
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. JOHNSON
Defendant:
HERBIK, R. HOOD, WEGIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
