Cases 41 - 50 of 76
RAJKOVIC v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv02082
Plaintiff:
LJUBICA RAJKOVIC
Defendant:
BARACK H. OBAMA, JAMES B. COMEY, DANIEL WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Jeff Williamson v. Barack Obama, et al
as 15-5284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeff H. Williamson
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Obama, Loretta E. Lynch, Michael E. Horowitz and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BANKS v. MABUS et al
as 1:2015cv01669
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
RAYMOND EDWIN MABUS, JR., SAM ERHART, NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
REID v. MABUS et al
as 1:2015cv01537
Plaintiff:
JESSE WAYNE REID, JR.
Defendant:
RAYMOND EDWIN MABUS, JR., SAM ERHART, POPELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
MURUGESAN et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv01359
Plaintiff:
VINOTH MURUGESAN and SHEELA RAVI BALASUBRAMANIAN
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LORETTA LYNCH, JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
PENAGALURI et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00876
Plaintiff:
NAGALATHA PENAGALURI and SATISH KUMAR BASETTY
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LORETTA LYNCH, JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Melinda Mckinzie v. Barack Obama, et al
as 15-5165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melinda Mckinzie
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, "BARRY", personally and in his official capacity, Michelle Lavaughn Robinson Obama, personally and in her official capacity, James B. Comey, FBI, personally and in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
