Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Julio Navas v. USDC-NVR
as 19-71100
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JULIO CESAR NAVAS
Not Yet Classified:
JAMES BACA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR NAVAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Julio Navas v. James Baca, et al
as 17-17314
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIO CESAR NAVAS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES BACA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Von Tobel v. Baca et al
as 3:2017cv00161
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, James Baca, Baugh and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Von Tobel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Baca et al
as 3:2013cv00565
Respondent:
James Baca, James Cox, L. Irvin and others
Petitioner:
Brick Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Burriola v. Nevada Department of Correctio, et al
as 13-16836
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY J. BURRIOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GLEN WHORTON, DARREL REXWINKEL and others
Kevin Holmes v. James Baca, et al
as 13-16838
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN RAY HOLMES
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES BACA, ATTORNEY GENERAL and BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS
Kevin Holmes v. USDC-NVR
as 13-72146
:
In re: KEVIN RAY HOLMES
Petitioner:
KEVIN RAY HOLMES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Real Party In Interest:
JAMES BACA, ATTORNEY GENERAL and BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS
Julio Navas v. James Baca, et al
as 13-16218
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIO CESAR NAVAS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES BACA and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
