Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Isler v. Spann
as 5:2026cv01118
Plaintiff:
Brian Adonis Isler
Defendant:
Warden James C. Spann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Oliver et al
as 4:2026cv00313
Plaintiff:
Bryan Vizion Lawson Jones
Defendant:
Tyronne Oliver, Benjamin Ford, Phillip Davenporte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan Jones v. James Spann, et al
as 26-13808
Plaintiff:
BRYAN LAWSON JONES
Defendant:
JAMES C. SPANN, ERIC COX, LUTRIA JONES and others
Carter v. Spann et al
as 5:2026cv00302
Plaintiff:
Rafael Carter
Defendant:
James C. Spann, Tyrone Oliver, John Doe, Control Booth Officer - G1/G2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SPANN et al
as 5:2025cv00129
Plaintiff:
BRYAN LAWSON JONES and VIZION JONES
Defendant:
Warden James C. Spann, Eric Cox, Lutria Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SPANN et al
as 5:2025cv00299
Plaintiff:
BRYAN LAWSON JONES and VIZION JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES C SPANN, DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC COX, DEPUTY WARDEN LUTRIA JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott v. Williams et al
as 5:2025cv00061
Plaintiff:
Lindberg Prescott
Defendant:
Tier Unit Manager Rowell, Warden James C. Spann, Deputy Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Trump et al
as 1:2025cv01165
Plaintiff:
Juante Kelly and Bilal Falaah Ibn Islam Abdul-Allah
Defendant:
Mr. Donald Trump, Dept. of Justice, Attorney General's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheppard v. Spann
as 1:2025cv00326
Petitioner:
Travis Sheppard
Respondent:
Warden James C. Spann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUFFIN v. SPANN
as 5:2024cv00410
Respondent:
JAMES C SPANN
Petitioner:
ANTONIO RUFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
