Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Bostic v. CoreCivic et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01017
Defendant: Dr. FNU Robertson and CoreCivic
Plaintiff: James E. Bostic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bostic v. Campbell et al
as 1:2020cv00140
Defendant: Katherine Campbell, Ms. f/n/u Woodley, f/n/u Larkhartt and others
Plaintiff: James E Bostic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bostic v. Tennessee Department of Corrections Officials et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00218
Defendant: BCCX, Tennessee Department of Corrections Officials and Bledsoe Prison Staffs
Plaintiff: James E Bostic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bostic v. Mehr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01031
Defendant: John Mehr and Madison County Gov.
Plaintiff: James E. Bostic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bostic v. Mehr et al
as 3:2020cv00073
Defendant: John Mehr and Madison County Gov.
Plaintiff: James E. Bostic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bostic v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00562
Plaintiff: James E. Bostic
Defendant: f/n/u Darrius, f/n/u Auston and f/n/u Dillion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bostic v. Bledsoe County Correctional Complex
as 3:2016cv03269
Plaintiff: James E. Bostic
Defendant: Bledsoe County Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bostic v. TDOC, et al
as 3:2016cv00192
Petitioner: James E. Bostic
Respondent: TDOC and Metro Gov.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bostic v. Biggs et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01068
Plaintiff: James E. Bostic
Defendant: Shara Biggs, Mental Health Cooperative, Inc. , Ensley Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bostic v. SCCF et al
as 1:2011cv00008
Plaintiff: James E. Bostic
Defendant: SCCF, CCA Contractor, Cherry L. Mood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?