Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bennett v. Howell et al
as 2:2019cv01417
Defendant:
Howell, Tate, James Harris III and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley W Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Williams
as 2:2019cv01180
Petitioner:
Conor James Harris
Respondent:
Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gholson et al v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2019cv00246
Defendant:
State of Nevada, City of Las Vegas, James Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Shafond Gholson, Sinbad S Gholson and Shafonda Gholson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Foley v. Teuton et al
as 2:2017cv01024
Defendant:
Kenneth Bourne, Clark County, Clark County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foley v. Bourne et al
as 2:2015cv00765
Defendant:
K. Bourne, Clark County Detention Center, Clark County, State of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Baker et al
as 3:2014cv00516
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Renee Baker
Petitioner:
Conor James Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Williams et al
as 2:2014cv00222
Defendant:
Bannister, Bureson, James Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHWAY INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC et al v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2011cv01173
Plaintiff:
ARCHWAY INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC, NEVADA INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC, TRINITY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC and others
Defendant:
BANK OF COMMERCE AND TRUST, KELLY DROUILLARD, FIRST UNITED BANK AND TRUST and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bass v. Harris et al
as 2:2011cv01017
Plaintiff:
Glen Alexander Bass
Defendant:
John Braff, James Harris and Titan International USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
