Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Jackson v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Reidie James Jackson
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin, Michael Britt, Paige Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunley v. Arlington Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Tamario Hunley
Defendant:
Arlington Police Department, Detective James Jackson, Officer Clint Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lombard v. Schober et al
as 4:2022cv00785
Plaintiff:
Wilton Irvon Lombard, Jr. and Wilton Irvon Lombard, Jr
Defendant:
Vic Schober, James Jackson, Richard Dubose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jackson v. Cruz et al
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Reidie Jackson and Reidie James Jackson
Defendant:
Ray Cruz, Chad Perry, Diana McBroom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Estavez
as 6:2022cv00288
Petitioner:
Reidie James Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Judge Ana Estavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 3:2021cv00073
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Reidie James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 3:2021cv00031
Petitioner:
Reidie Jackson and Reidie James Jackson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2021cv00021
Petitioner:
Reidie Jackson and Reidie James Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Baidoo et al
as 4:2020cv03920
Defendant:
Major Julia M Rodriguez, Captain Garrett R Simmons and James A Baidoo
Plaintiff:
Reidie James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2020cv00516
Plaintiff:
Richard James Jackson
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
