Cases 1 - 10 of 28
James Roudabush, Jr. v. McKool, et al
as 16-4236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MCKOOL, Lt., Supv. of SHU, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, C. DYNAN, Ass't Warden and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Renee Bumb, et al
as 16-3404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RENEE M. BUMB, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. McKool, et al
as 16-3403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MCKOOL, Lt., Supv. of SHU, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, C. DYNAN, Ass't Warden and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Reyes, et al
as 16-2724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
REYES, CAPTAIN, VINCENT, LT. and WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Bitener, et al
as 16-2723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BITENER, LT., T. JONES, SANCHEZ, DET. and others
Defendant:
KOEPPEN, MARCHANELLO, LT., GRANT and others
In re: James Roudabush, Jr.
as 16-2606
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Respondent:
DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
James Roudabush, Jr. v. E. Hall, et al
as 16-2147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
E. HALL, Lt., MARCHANELLO, Lt., BITENER, Lt. and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 16-2149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, Central Office, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: James Roudabush, Jr.
as 16-1860
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Respondent:
E. HALL, Lt., MARCHANELLO, Ltd., LT. BITENER, Lt. and others
Nominal Respondent:
NOEL L. HILLMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
