Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Jacquelyn Miller v. USDC-CALA
as 23-70094
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JACQUELYN MILLER, DYLAN FARRIS, TUSD Chief Personnel Officer of Human Resurces, KEITH BUTLER, TUSD Chief Business Officer of the Business Office and others
Petitioner:
JACQUELYN MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Parks v. Resurgent Capital Services LP et al
as 3:2022cv03272
Plaintiff:
James Parks
Defendant:
Resurgent Capital Services LP and TrueAccord Corp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Park et al v. Shinhan Bank America et al
as 1:2022cv10331
Plaintiff:
James Park, Geoffrey Adamson, Catherine Ramos and others
Defendant:
Shinhan Bank America, Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd., Shinhan Bank Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1831 j Depository Institution Employee Protection Remedy
David Meyers v. Kevin Krebs
as 21-6657
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD VORHIS, Assistant Attorney General, SUPERINTENDENT, Virginia State Police, MARK HERRING, Virginia Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. G. Kellett
as 21-6678
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES PARKS, Manager of Offender Management Services, VADOC, G. KELLETT, Unit Manager, G.E.O., DR. WILLIAMS, G.E.O., LVCC Eye Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6674
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN IVAN GILMORE, Chief Warden, COUNSELOR R. BRITT, ANGELA WETHINGTON, Operations Manager/PREA Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Darrell Parks v. USA, et al
as 21-5059
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Elizabeth Trosman, Thomas J. Tourish, Jr., AUSA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell James Parks
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7238
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
