Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Gilreath-Johnson v. Potter et al
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jamie Gilreath-Johnson
Defendant:
Corey Potter, Kyle Potter, Alaska Tendering Hiring Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Reuchlein v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Franz Reuchlein
Defendant:
April White, Wesley Renfrow and Jamie Acton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrew v. Lamerouk et al
as 3:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Jamie Shoaf, Kimberly Kardashian, John D. Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda K. Andrew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Municipality of Anchorage et al
as 3:2020cv00304
Defendant:
Crystal Kennedy, Dean Gates, Kate Vogel and others
Plaintiff:
Nial Sherwood Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latham v. Acton et al
as 3:2019cv00258
Defendant:
Jamie Acton, Will Brown and Sandy James
Plaintiff:
Ben Latham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MGM Resorts International et al v. Corbin et al
as 3:2018cv00168
Plaintiff:
Mandalay Resort Group, MGM Resorts International, MGM Resorts Venue Management, LLC and others
Defendant:
Jamie Huddleston, Kelli Turnbow, Dawni L. Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
DelPriore v. Easy Park et al
as 3:2018cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jason Martin DelPriore
Defendant:
Easy Park, Justin McClure, Jamie Shaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ambrose v. O'brien et al
as 4:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
David Ralph Ambrose
Defendant:
Jamie Abrev, Michael O'Brien, Laura McCollough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hankins et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00207
Plaintiff:
Nikhil David Hankins and Jamie Lee Fessenden
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Volkswagen AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCarty v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Jamie Michele McCarty
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
