Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Doe v. Maloit
as 1:2024cv02383
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Frank Daniel Maloit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Thompson (PS) v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv02086
Plaintiff:
Clarence Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
Medical Provider, Joe Roybal and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Burning Man Project et al
as 1:2024cv02045
Defendant:
Ranger Hazelnut, Dave Wellhauser, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Estrada (PS) v. Doe
as 1:2024cv02107
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, John/Jane Doe and Michael Tessean
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Leon Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kocsan v. Doe(s)
as 1:2024cv02020
Plaintiff:
Kristi Kocsan
Defendant:
Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Kocsan v. Doe(s)
as 1:2024cv02023
Defendant:
Jane Doe(s)
Plaintiff:
Kristi Kocsan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe v. Tysk
as 1:2024cv01720
Counter-Defendant:
Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Joseph G. Tysk
Counter-Claimant:
Joseph G. Tysk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. v. Does 1-100 et al
as 1:2024cv01716
Defendant:
XYZ Company, Jane Does 1-100 and John Does 1-100
Plaintiff:
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Doe v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03350
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 sh - Diversity: Sexual Harassment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
